PDA

View Full Version : Fear 1 or fear 2


DeafSunchaser
02-16-2009, 05:58 AM
what do u prefer?

sllick50
02-16-2009, 06:09 AM
I choose FEAR 1 because of the single player campaign replay value. Much more fun challenges for achievements.:uzi:

Lordvader178
02-16-2009, 07:44 AM
FEAR 1, because it's very memorable. FEAR 2 feels like Condemned 2. I love it, but FEAR 1 is still my favourite.

asnaz11
02-16-2009, 10:46 AM
Fear 2 is better in pretty much every way imo. Don't get me wrong I love Fear 1 and Fear Files. But this game really hits the spot for me...The only thing I miss about Fear 1 is the fact Y wasn't Slow Motion...god i hate it.

MrEastSide
02-16-2009, 07:40 PM
The achievements in FEAR 1 gave you more to do, but as far as gameplay and variety, that goes to FEAR 2. Even though I loved FEAR 1, it got so boring walking through the same color palette non-stop. Anyone want to go shoot some bad guys in some office cubicles, with nothing but white and gray walls? :rant:

laundryman
02-16-2009, 08:47 PM
F.E.A.R. 1 all the way. This just doesn't have the same lasting appeal as the first and for myself, it doesn't pull me in as much as the first one did.

KemicalSupreme
02-16-2009, 08:59 PM
I am a firm believer that nothing ever beats the first of anything. I do think Fear 2 is great, but Fear 1 will have that special place.

MR MACLAINE
02-16-2009, 09:39 PM
really good poll!!

with fear 2 there where some things.... that i cann't understand?!?

the game looks great, i really, really love the look - it's not "groundbrekaing" but it really kicks! the single-player campaign is pretty nice - i like this "movie telling" - you know what i mean - the action is great - and DAMN the shockers are stunning! only the first level can handle the complete shock effects of fear 1 (the music box is sooo evil, and when alma appears near the pool i was about to cry!).

the first game was an innovation - no question. but like some ppl allready said - the game looks way to drab :( the action was good and the enemies clever but the fights where a lil' bit boaring - but fear 2 is more like a real shooter. for sure was the first game way more challenging but in my opinion the game claimed that attitute by being unfair - when you played on extreme - the enemy shot, you wheren't fast enough - BAM - you're DEAD (best example where the instant action maps).

so the story mode goes 100 % to the sequel!

BUT - f*ck the multiplayer in fear 2 :( i was such a fan from the multiplayer games in the first one, but the second game really sucks - the movement is not qualified for fast multiplayer games and the WHOLE physik is different. you need much more bullets to take an enemy down and the old med-kit / bullet vest system was way more comfortable for a breath taking battle... when you only play the multiplayer you can think of totay different franchises?!? i mean innovation is good and needfull but NOT IN THAT WAY!

lostmotiv
02-16-2009, 09:40 PM
I like fear 2 better, it just seems to keep my interest longer. the original definitely had more "jump" factor though. it was also much more difficult which may have biased my judgment a little