PDA

View Full Version : First review of website for this game from PALGN.com and gave 70%


cheevo360
01-31-2012, 12:23 PM
http://palgn.com.au/xbox-360/19973/neverdead-review/

Game is good :)

Hawaiian
01-31-2012, 10:33 PM
Joystiq Review:
http://www.joystiq.com/2012/01/31/neverdead-review/

http://www.blogcdn.com/www.joystiq.com/media/2010/06/review-three-stars.jpg

Eurogamer Review:
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2012-01-31-neverdead-review

6/10

Official Xbox Magazine:
http://www.oxmonline.com/neverdead-review

75%

cheevo360
02-01-2012, 01:59 AM
Yeah now IGN gave 30%

http://uk.xbox360.ign.com/articles/121/1217615p1.html

IGN think this game is poor designs, very frustrate gameplay, non-story, boring and crap. lol

Hoborg
02-01-2012, 05:36 AM
Stay away from it. It's most likely really bad.

ThaMyth
02-01-2012, 12:25 PM
actually not that bad, has it moments of wtf, but is a new take on an old formula.

cheevo360
02-01-2012, 01:27 PM
I waiting for my game to arrive since I preordered last week and shopto.net posted yesterday and not arrive today so hope arrive tomorrow :)

I don't care about how bad this is, I want earn achievements for it :)

AirborneRichard
02-01-2012, 07:29 PM
I waiting for my game to arrive since I preordered last week and shopto.net posted yesterday and not arrive today so hope arrive tomorrow :)

I don't care about how bad this is, I want earn achievements for it :)

Why ppl always so obssesed with achievements? I mean honest this is about the game not achievements, if a game sucks then the achievements not saving it either. As for never dead as always the US dudes get their hands on it first we guys from the europe got to wait untill 2th of february.

Sir scotch 2 u
02-02-2012, 11:20 AM
Why ppl always so obssesed with achievements? I mean honest this is about the game not achievements, if a game sucks then the achievements not saving it either. As for never dead as always the US dudes get their hands on it first we guys from the europe got to wait untill 2th of february.
why you on an acheivement forum if u just gonna bitch about people wantin to earn then, get teeee

Shazaeomon
02-02-2012, 11:51 PM
IGN sure was harsh with it; me personally, if I was to review the game and give it a number score, around a 7 to 7.5 would suffice. After all, if they want to preach about the been there, done that bit... why has Call of Duty been getting high reviews lately? Just for an example.

acdczombie
02-03-2012, 05:36 AM
IGN sure was harsh with it; me personally, if I was to review the game and give it a number score, around a 7 to 7.5 would suffice. After all, if they want to preach about the been there, done that bit... why has Call of Duty been getting high reviews lately? Just for an example.

FINALLY. I love you for that.

Vermillion Haze
02-03-2012, 08:02 AM
It has a 53/100 score on metacritic. Which is averaged based on 27 different reviews. So my advice...wait till this games on the bargain rack. Which won't be that long.

acdczombie
02-03-2012, 10:24 AM
It has a 53/100 score on metacritic. Which is averaged based on 27 different reviews. So my advice...wait till this games on the bargain rack. Which won't be that long.

Why do people put so much stock into critic's opinion? Because they get paid for it? That gives it more value because they are being compensated for it?

AirborneRichard
02-03-2012, 11:17 AM
why you on an acheivement forum if u just gonna bitch about people wantin to earn then, get teeee

Being on an achievement forum and saying something about some ppl and how obssesed they are getting 1000G on every game is another thing realy.
Look i,m cool with it and this site is to help ppl to see how there is an easy or better way to earn some achievements, but achievements should not control you life thats all i meant to say, no need to going rude realy. If your one of those that felt attacked i could care less realy i just made my point end of story.

Vermillion Haze
02-03-2012, 12:25 PM
Why do people put so much stock into critic's opinion? Because they get paid for it? That gives it more value because they are being compensated for it?


Obviously reviews have more then just "Opinions" and mindless critiques. They are normally required to provide basic information about the game itself. Information if cross-referenced with other reviews will give you a better idea at what your looking at. I don't put "Stock" into any critics opinion individually but if every critic is saying the same thing. And the user reveiws reflect as much. Chances are theres something to it, don't you think?