PDA

View Full Version : Reviews


Barad
05-22-2012, 04:22 PM
IGN gives it an 8.5 :woop:

http://uk.ign.com/articles/2012/05/22/ghost-recon-future-soldier-review

Purge
05-22-2012, 04:29 PM
... Just pre-ordered. Dammit.

EDIT:

X360A gave it a 70. Not the worst!

Slightlykrazy
05-22-2012, 05:05 PM
I'd agree with X360A a 7 sounds about right. Graphics look like they're from 2 years ago. Muiltiplayer feels outdated. With the exception of gunsmith, that's something really cool.

koopakiller64
05-22-2012, 05:15 PM
I'd give it about an 8. MP and Campaign may not be the best, but it holds my attention. Graphics are fine to me and audio on guns is reasonable. Gunsmith is the best thing about this game.

RYARNI
05-22-2012, 05:21 PM
Was tempted on picking this up tomorrow but looking at Metacritic I dont think ill bother for a couple of months. 77 so far, not amazing, can wait.

Final Breed
05-22-2012, 05:32 PM
I don't read reviews anymore, too many bad reviews on games i actually enjoyed personally. Been a fan of Tom Clancy's games and gonna stay a fan. I wish they'd remake Ghost Recon 2 Summit Strike!

fonzycore
05-22-2012, 06:05 PM
Well I just picked up my pre-order at Gamestop for the signature edition, I'll chime in later on how I feel, been excited though@!

WH Gercain
05-22-2012, 06:35 PM
Wow just read Richard Walkers review here (X360A) He gives it a 70 but his review reads like a 50. Not sure about his. Other reviews have been a little better about explaining their numbers. Game Rankings average was 78 at this post so I'll still pick it up. To me 70 and up is a buyable title.

York82
05-22-2012, 08:11 PM
What about the graphics? Arent the campaign gameplay videos which were posted here from xbox360? Or PC? Because they looked awsome!! =)
Ghost Recon always looked great!

cHRiSCOe
05-22-2012, 08:17 PM
What about the graphics? Arent the campaign gameplay videos which were posted here from xbox360? Or PC? Because they looked awsome!! =)
Ghost Recon always looked great!

Graphics are par..............If this was 2007

York82
05-22-2012, 08:25 PM
Graphics are par..............If this was 2007

seriously??

Slightlykrazy
05-22-2012, 08:58 PM
seriously??

Seriously.

Kaskade
05-22-2012, 09:47 PM
The game is really fun but the only issue I have is with the MP lag but its I can give it a pass since it just came out today and everybody is trying to get on. Also hate the fact that if you want to play campaign co-op or Guerilla/horde mode you cant get matched up with random ppl,you have to actually get a squad on your own time

koopakiller64
05-22-2012, 09:52 PM
Graphics are par..............If this was 2007

I don't see where the hate for graphics is coming from. The game looks like any other game that isn't a Triple A title. I will agree that facial animations are horrendous, but the environment and guns is nothing to complain about.

DEG23
05-22-2012, 11:51 PM
I'll take x360a's review over IGN's any day. I'm starting to have second thoughts about pre-ordering this now. I'm sure it will be okay but it is worrying considering how long this was pushed back for, i was hoping for it to be polished.

chach7171
05-23-2012, 05:32 AM
The in game graphics look tight as hell i'm sorry. Especially with the different vision effects, the cutscenes however yes are lacking especially the faces. Those look god awful, but considering how everyone bitches about having to watch cutscenes why would they care anyways? props to the devs for plugging Pantera's 5 minutes alone in though, that kicked ass hahah.