I don't mind my thread being shot down, as I have already stated. I just don't like your last word needing attitude. My thread was an ok idea, not great not bad. Not good enough for the site, fair enough, but your attitude was what got me. If you said what you said and left it open, I would have been 100% fine. If you gave evidence of why it was bad/not needed I would of seen your point and agreed. But no, you say "this sucks, cause it won't happen because..." "LOCK" then I'm going to be pissed. I want to get every possible answer of thatt topic to see 100% why it is so bad, or atleast a good 60%. Your 10% is just not good enough.
Again, I don't mind the thread being rejected, I just hate your "I'm the best" attitude.
I'm going to add, that I have contacted the complaints board, (similar subject) they just don't care, and get this---mods can see it! How do I know? I sent a complaint, 5 minutes later I saw a mod responde to the complaint (not 1 admin logged in during that hour).
I'm nobody? I'm part of the staff. I help make the decisions that run the site. If you don't like my answer, submit a complaint or contact someone higher up (admins) and see what they think. But in this case, I can 100% guarantee you they would agree with me on this decision, hence the reason I shot it down, hence the reason I locked the thread. There is no need to discuss something that has a complete 0% chance of happening on this site. Which is exactly what your suggestion falls under.
I can also guarantee if it was an admin that directly shot your idea down, you wouldn't have gone on this tirade, so I'd check your attitude at the door next time. They put me in this position because they trust my judgment, so you can like it or not, but that's the way it is.
Yea, easy to check dates in the game info box. I don't have the time to find out which games are like above, so that is why I just put "Game", but games are like that. Halo is somewhat like that.
So I find it pointless to even lock that thread, it had thought, it had improvement. It may not have been great, but you once again, last word and locked, which shows your personalitly.
I wish I could have posted this in my thread, but I can't. I could have PMed this, but then it wouldn't been like the thread, where people can read it. It is harder to response about a thread, not in the thread. I respect your opinion, but I still find it pointless to lock a thread, just because you, yourself, don't like it. Who are you to speak for a whole? You in reality nobody, just like the rest of us.
Not trying to be rude about this, I am just doing the same as you.
I find it really stupid to lock the thread, it may be unneeded for you, but that's you. As I said the sites dates are almost always wrong, or they do not have dates at all.
I have no idea why you posted the same response when you even quoted me, whereas in that quote I already mentioned what I jsut repeated. Older games should be updated, and new games are still wrong.
I am not saying it was a good idea, nor a bad idea, what the main point of the idea was, since games have prequels and sequels of prequels the series get out of order, and that is why the idea was thought of. Yes, I could check x360a release dates but this is what it would look like.
Game 1- Jan 1, 06
Game 2 - March 3, 07
Game 1 Preqeul - No date
Game 3 - No date
Game 2 Sequel - Sep 1 08
Game 1 Preqel--Sequel - No date