PlaystationTrophies Got a news tip?

Go Back > Members List
Subscribe    Donate

Gorilla Stomper Gorilla Stomper is offline

Visitor Messages

Showing Visitor Messages 21 to 30 of 184
  1. Gackt
    08-18-2013 06:36 AM
    I no see your posts lately. Where you be ya bastard?
  2. Felonious Monk
    07-27-2013 09:04 PM
    Felonious Monk

    no that's fine I did stop using it. Just peeked in, felt the list being smaller, scanned it for someone's name I'd recognize, found you missing is all.

    Yeah since I stopped playing Rock Band Blitz since my connection at home has been down, there's been not much reason to obsessively check my facebook.
  3. Felonious Monk
    07-27-2013 06:56 PM
    Felonious Monk
    Tom did you delete your facebook
  4. Purge
  5. dakisbac
    07-14-2013 04:04 AM
    Then what is the point in a defense if it isn't their job to prove a crime wasn't committed? Sit there and point out discrepancies?
    That's not sarcasm, that's a genuine question.

    There are resources that would better explain this to you, but yes that's the idea.

    The idea that a person is "innocent until proven guilty" means that the onus is on the prosecutor to prove the guilt of the defendant, and the standard to which they must prove their case is the point "beyond a reasonable doubt". Therefore it follows that the defense need not prove innocence, but just supply a reasonable doubt, which is much easier.


    Say you're charged with shooting a man to death. It happened in broad daylight, there were witnesses, and your fingerprints are on the gun. Seems pretty obvious that you're guilty.

    Now let me introduce reasonable doubt: your twin brother was standing right next to you when it happened and his fingerprints are on the gun as well.
  6. dakisbac
    07-14-2013 04:04 AM
    All your defense needs to show is that your twin also had means, motive, and opportunity and you can possibly get away with this. The defense doesn't need to prove that your brother is guilty (which in turn proves your innocence, since only one of you shot this victim) only that it could have been him. The fact that it could have been him definitely falls under "reasonable doubt" and therefore you must be found not guilty.

    That example is very dumbed down, but I hope it illustrates the difference.

    Believe what you want, the verdict disagrees with you.

    You shouldn't really ever post anything like this, since the verdict doesn't necessarily equate to the truth. Even in the eyes of the law, it doesn't hold much water: you can be acquitted in a criminal trial and found guilty in a civil trial or vice versa, due to different standards of proof.
  7. Foxxy kyle
    07-14-2013 03:41 AM
    Foxxy kyle
    It's all just a case on race anyways. Yet somehow on Facebook I am getting called the racist one.
  8. Spade.
    06-11-2013 10:11 PM
    I see you are finding the XB1 forum to your liking.
  9. One Winged Joker
    05-11-2013 05:45 PM
    One Winged Joker
    +1 to Smoochy. This is the last time I search a funny video while in the middle of the street. I think the funny farm guys appeared a couple of minutes after I left the place where every bystander could watch me clap like a retarded seal.
  10. Smoochy
    04-28-2013 10:37 PM
    Just figured I'd point out how awesome your new avatar is.

About Me

  • Gaming Information
    Steam ID
  • Basic Information
  • Signature


Total Posts
Visitor Messages
General Information
  • Join Date: 06-30-2008
  • Referrals: 1


Showing Friends 1 to 10 of 25

My Awards

Awards Showcase - 1 Awards
Icon Image Description
Name: 2,500 Posts
This member has made 2500 posts on the forum
Issue time: 01-11-2013 03:51 AM
Issue reason:

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:32 PM.