JJBDude Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 I disagree with History Channel: Battle for the Pacific being in the under 10 hours category. I played the game from 10:30AM to 9:30PM yesterday, a total of 11 hours. 10 hours of that was spent boosting with an extra 2 hours spent boosting the night before. I also spent 30 minutes the day before on the first level of the game. Finally I finished up the last 4 levels of the game today in an hour and a bit. To sum this up in an easier to understand manner. Boosting = 12 hours Single Player = 3 hours Of course I had to boost back the people that boosted me, if everyone is just boosting you then it would be quicker but I thought the timeline was to boost all members of the party in a fair manner. I'd also like to mention at some point there were 6 of us boosting making it go much faster than if there was just 2 people (like the majority of the gamers that play this game do), so I wouldn't be surprised if it took others more than 12 hours to get all the boosting achievements. In conclusion I believe the game should be at least in the 10-15 hours range, if not the 15 to 25. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Pants Party Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 No they should not. The maximum possible is less than 900 and therefor disqualifies it from the list. Aha, didn't know how many were glitched. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o0EVIL0o x360a Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 View Changelog for updates Also, when the Changelog is full, I will be deleting the older ones so I can make space for more changes. Any suggestions are welcome. Also, I will be adding the links later today. It's my berfday, y'all! Are you back Perp?? Thought you gave this thread away?? lol Happy Birthday by the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EOU Findub Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 I disagree with History Channel: Battle for the Pacific being in the under 10 hours category. I played the game from 10:30AM to 9:30PM yesterday, a total of 11 hours. 10 hours of that was spent boosting with an extra 2 hours spent boosting the night before. I also spent 30 minutes the day before on the first level of the game. Finally I finished up the last 4 levels of the game today in an hour and a bit. To sum this up in an easier to understand manner. Boosting = 12 hours Single Player = 3 hours Of course I had to boost back the people that boosted me, if everyone is just boosting you then it would be quicker but I thought the timeline was to boost all members of the party in a fair manner. I'd also like to mention at some point there were 6 of us boosting making it go much faster than if there was just 2 people (like the majority of the gamers that play this game do), so I wouldn't be surprised if it took others more than 12 hours to get all the boosting achievements. In conclusion I believe the game should be at least in the 10-15 hours range, if not the 15 to 25. Agree completely. It should be moved up.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerpetualHeaven Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 Are you back Perp?? Thought you gave this thread away?? lol Happy Birthday by the way. Yeah, the other ones were falling way behind. Being the hero I am, I picked up the slack haha. As for this thread, Pants will be running it. If he's ever too busy, I'll just update it. Doubt it though since he's a pretty punctual and consistent guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
antnie Posted June 29, 2009 Share Posted June 29, 2009 How about breaking the 15-25, into 15-20 and 20-25? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerpetualHeaven Posted June 29, 2009 Share Posted June 29, 2009 How about breaking the 15-25, into 15-20 and 20-25? The games that are in the 15-25 are generally, from my experience, a lot more indecisive on whether they can be definitively put into 15-20 or 20-25. When playing those games, most people can finish them in the lower or upper range depending on what they do. It's very broad, yes, but it gives the gamer a better idea of what to expect. Tomb Raider Underworld, for example, can be done in 18 hours or so (w/ DLC), but I'm sure plenty of people might finish it in mid-to-upper 20s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CuppaChoc Posted June 30, 2009 Share Posted June 30, 2009 Re: History Channel: Battle for the Pacific Agree completely. It should be moved up.... I second that, it took me about 16 hours from start to finish. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o0EVIL0o x360a Posted June 30, 2009 Share Posted June 30, 2009 How about breaking the 15-25, into 15-20 and 20-25? Yeah, there's no way dude. Some of those games can actually fluctuate from 15-25 depending on luck and player skill. Splitting it up would cause more arguments than anything. Just consider the list 1-10 is fast, 10-15 is medium, and 15-25 are the longer games on the list. These are just approximations though since people tend to claim to beating games faster than is feasible for a first time player on that game. The games may take you 2-5 hours longer than the list suggests, so be warned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerpetualHeaven Posted June 30, 2009 Share Posted June 30, 2009 Ghostbusters! Where does it go? I see 15+ in the road map. Everyone agree? Re: History Channel: Battle for the Pacific I second that, it took me about 16 hours from start to finish. I'll do that when I get some feedback on Ghostbusters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SetoChaos Posted June 30, 2009 Share Posted June 30, 2009 Ghostbusters! Where does it go? I see 15+ in the road map. Everyone agree? I'll do that when I get some feedback on Ghostbusters. Sound's good, didn't know it was easy gamerscore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuckin Fooots Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 Please change this to 945 since 55 points are no longer possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Porpoise King Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 Thanks for this list. It is extremely helpful! Keep up the good work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damian 83 Posted July 8, 2009 Share Posted July 8, 2009 Lma Manager 2007 20-25 Dynasty Warriors 6 Empires 7-10 Ghostbusters 15+ Harry Potter Half blood 4-8 Transformers 2 10+ Ice Age 4-5 Ski Doo Snowmobile challenge 7-9 Infernal hell vengeance 15-25 taken from roadmaps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildestdream93 Posted July 10, 2009 Share Posted July 10, 2009 thanks for list, really helpful Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JC Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 Harry Potter: HBP guide says it takes 8-10 hours to complete Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs takes 4-5 hours including to the guide. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuckin Fooots Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 Harry Potter: HBP guide says it takes 8-10 hours to complete Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs takes 4-5 hours including to the guide. Both of those were posted two messages before yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank9080 Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 Harry Potter: HBP guide says it takes 8-10 hours to complete Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs takes 4-5 hours including to the guide. Ice Age should be in the 5-10 section because I have read through the forum and some of the challenges give people a lot of trouble. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veteran Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 Ice Age took me 4 hours and that was including having trouble with the egg rolls and scratt challenges.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fizzmatix Posted July 11, 2009 Share Posted July 11, 2009 Stoked, Velvet Assassin and Skate 2 are quite straight forward without to much effort to gain 1000. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerpetualHeaven Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 Check changelog for what I've added. If there's anything missing (such as boosting or collecting icons), let me know so I can add them ASAP. I left Ice Age in the under 5 as opposed to 5-10. Even though the challenges may be hard, having an extra hour to finish them (4 to just under 5) sounds like enough time to finish up a challenge in a kid's game. If I see a lot of contrasting views, I'll change it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frank9080 Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 If I have read correctly Ghostbusters and Infernal each have a possible of 980 because of glitched achievements. If anyone can add insight that would be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pashos Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 Ice Age has collectibles so a C needs to be added to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veteran Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 If I have read correctly Ghostbusters and Infernal each have a possible of 980 because of glitched achievements. If anyone can add insight that would be great. Urgh so first Infernal doesn't stack and then you find out the game's got a glitched achievement? I'm most certainly not playing it then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o0 TommyGuns 0o Posted July 12, 2009 Share Posted July 12, 2009 (edited) Stoked, Velvet Assassin and Skate 2 are quite straight forward without to much effort to gain 1000. great so should those 3 games be put in the straight forward or the not much effort section? also harry potter: HBP needs a © for collectibles Edited July 12, 2009 by o0 TommyGuns 0o Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts