Jensen Luhar Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Joyce's Ulysses . Took me two years to read it twice and I would be lying if I said I totally understood it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paka Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Princesses: The Six Daughters of George III by Flora Fraser was a tough one because, even though I'm very interested in the general subject area, Fraser is almost over-detailed and her writing is incredibly dry. She is not as good an author as her mother Antonia, who is one of my favorite authors. Supposed to be for a popular audience but much more like a scholarly text. On that note, as much as I enjoy reading such books in our library, there is one thing about them that makes reading them tough. That is, that the authors generally leave certain languages untranslated when quoting passages from other sources, particularly French and Latin. For some of the books I check out, constantly have to use online translation. I can read some basic French but not enough to really get by. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hydrosugar Posted February 15, 2012 Share Posted February 15, 2012 Probably anything by Shakespeare, the language can throw me a little. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrimSovereignty Posted February 16, 2012 Author Share Posted February 16, 2012 Wuthering Heights..is also another book that I just find crazy hard to read, I had to read it for class but I just gave up and used spark notes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpiralDots Posted April 13, 2012 Share Posted April 13, 2012 I found the Hunchback of Notre Dame pretty challenging at first, just because he keeps going off on tangents and spending 30+ pages talking about the history of Paris or of Notre Dame and it's just such a challenge to work your way through that. The actual story itself isn't hard at all, it's just getting to it that is challenging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kyschneid Posted April 24, 2012 Share Posted April 24, 2012 Pretty much anything by Joyce is tough to get through. The man has some great things to say, I just wish he was a little clearer in saying them. It's definitely easier if you start with his earlier stuff. Dubliners is a great read, and much easier to get through than, say, Ulysses. But Ulysses isn't nearly as tough once you start to get a feel for how he writes. Joyce is a brilliant author, and that's probably why it's so hard to understand his stuff. It's hard to understand the mind of a genius. Oh, and Finnegan's Wake is completely unreadble. It's not that it's a bad book. I'm not saying it's good, either. It's just one of those things where there's almost no hope of ever understanding it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BenS Posted June 18, 2013 Share Posted June 18, 2013 F all that. Try reading Ulysses by James Joyce. I read it in my second year English Lit class. The challenging part comes at you from every possible angle. From content to length. I'm a pretty big Shakespeare fan. No matter how much you love the stories, reading them can be a huge chore. No way, Ulysses is easy compared to Finnegan's Wake. I found that the essential pleasure of Ulysses was the constant mixing up of Greek myth and Modernist takes on patterns of imagery, eg the body parts wtf?, but the Wake isjust impenetrable... And Shakespeare is great. Especially Lear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sasquach11235 Posted July 19, 2013 Share Posted July 19, 2013 I still haven't managed to finish Le Morte d'Arthur by Thomas Malory. I made it through about 1000 pages (that isn't a typo) before giving up at a little over the 1/2 way mark. They still hadn't gotten around to the holy grail quest at that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erikepaios Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 Finnegan's Wake, which remains incomprehensible and undecipherable to me. Thucydides and Demosthenes in the original Greek. Other ancient authors renowned for their opacity, e.g. Aeschylus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darth nerdius Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 The silamarillion. Trying to keep up with all those freaking elvish names and timelines was to tedious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opiate42 Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 The silamarillion. Trying to keep up with all those freaking elvish names and timelines was to tedious. That one is a rough go. But for me it was Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand. Sweet mother of trout that fucking book was a dragging tedious slog from hell. Late in the book there's a rant by the John Galt character.... that I swear is longer than the whole Silmarillion. ONE RANT. Psychotic. It just keeps going and going. And on top of that Rand's writing is didactic and hard to swallow. It was an awful experience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty-Rex Posted August 26, 2013 Share Posted August 26, 2013 deffo Bunnicula. it is a tough read about a rabbit who sucks juice from veggies harrowing That one is a rough go. But for me it was Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand. Sweet mother of trout that fucking book was a dragging tedious slog from hell. Late in the book there's a rant by the John Galt character.... that I swear is longer than the whole Silmarillion. ONE RANT. Psychotic. It just keeps going and going. And on top of that Rand's writing is didactic and hard to swallow. It was an awful experience. [spoiler=69]Because it's a bad, dumb book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opiate42 Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 [spoiler=69]Because it's a bad, dumb book. [spoiler=rand]Worst part is, it's so dumb it thinks it's smart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ty-Rex Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 [spoiler=rand]Worst part is, it's so dumb it thinks it's smart. [spoiler=ballz]Worstest part is, there are grown adults who actually think that Objectivism is a good philosophy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felonious Monk Posted August 28, 2013 Share Posted August 28, 2013 (edited) I'm going to beat the poop out of the both of you. And since that's a service I'm offering and providing to you that you so badly need, I must insist upon a payment of two Mulligan gold pieces. I was pretty proud of plowing through Atlus Shrugged, but Galt's speech is just... ugh. I already know what he's going to say. He's got a concise motto that everyone that buys into it has to recite anyway; why drag it out? Anthem was shorter and conveyed nearly the same message concisely. There's a graphic novel out there that made it even shorter than the novella. I can summarize Atlus Shrugged in four thoughts, though: 1. In case of cabin depressurization, place the mask on your face first before placing it on a child, disabled or other person that may need your assistance. 2. From the movie "A Beautiful Mind": If no one goes for the blonde, we all get laid. 3. Contrary to Rand's side of where the pendulum goes to the extreme, selfishness will not trump charity. Selfishness is optimal and will always trump faux charity. 4. Everything has value and nothing is free. Everything?EVERYTHING. The Portrait of Dorian Grey has been mostly painful thus far. And if I stopped reading The Hound of the Baskervilles right now, I'd think it was the most obnoxious thing I've ever read and would wonder why Doyle had any following at all. Holmes isn't just a dick. He's a Mary Sue dick. Edited August 28, 2013 by Felonious Monk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Looter1 Posted November 27, 2013 Share Posted November 27, 2013 Trying to get my head into the 'scottish' accent reading Irvine Welsh's Trainspotting was quite tough for me - but then I find the thick Scots accent (esp Glasgow) quite hard to understand on the best of days. Another 'Accent-writing' one that was a little tough for me was Anthony Burgess' A Clockwork Orange. As for plot: William Burroughs' Naked Lunch was pretty darn near incomprehensible unless, like the author you were off your face on multiple mixes of drugs the whole time that you read it (I believe mostly hash mixed with morphiene/heroin). Fear & Loathing in Las Vegas (by Hunter S. Thompson) has similar echoes but is a little bit less surreal overall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandaliamcod6 Posted December 15, 2013 Share Posted December 15, 2013 (edited) The Prince by Machiavelli, I read the book when I was 15. To a certain extent it proved to be relatively taxing. http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-x5G09a0QbqA/TwoBAty_-GI/AAAAAAAAAaM/qNpB45j1i60/s1600/The+Prince.jpg Edited December 15, 2013 by pandaliamcod6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dante XBA Posted December 15, 2013 Share Posted December 15, 2013 I enjoy Shakespeare even though I have to look back at it, but there's one book that I found horrendous to read. Gulliver's Travels was 200 pages or so of straight, unadulterated walls of old British text. The fact that the book smelled like it was 70 years old, making me nauseous 5 minutes after opening it, didn't help, but damn was it a chore. Oh, and Spade? You only underline book titles when physically writing book names. You italicize them when typing them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kranberee Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 I totally struggled with Gone with the Wind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trach555 Posted January 19, 2014 Share Posted January 19, 2014 try "Nad Niemnem"... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ten Foot Bunny Posted January 31, 2014 Share Posted January 31, 2014 (edited) One of the toughest books to get through (for me) was "The Mystical Qabalah" by Dion Fortune. It discusses (in depth) jewish mysticism, which was previously an oral tradition. It's interesting materialm but there's quite alot to it, (tarot, astrology, astronomy, theology...) I'm happy to be reading George R.R. Martin novels now! I may be quoting an ancient post here, but it's SO true: The Mystical Qabalah is a pretty thick read, as are most of Dion Fortune's practical works. Then again, you can say that about almost everything written by any follower of the Golden Dawn. However, her fictional works The Secrets of Dr. Taverner, The Goat-Foot God, and (especially) The Sea Priestess are among my favorite books of all time. My most challenging book? I once took a stab at James Joyce's Finnegans Wake and found it completely incompatible with my ADHD. Then again, I think it's incompatible with humanity in general given the number of English-speakers (not to mention other people in this thread) who find the book equally painful. I also had much of the same problems while reading Remembrance of Things Past by Marcel Proust. Some day I intend to finish it just to say I did! Edited January 31, 2014 by Ten Foot Bunny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mudlo7581 Posted April 3, 2014 Share Posted April 3, 2014 Well it depends on what you mean by challenging here. If you mean one that forces you to deal with serious moral questions, then prehaps Velocity by Dean Koontz. Geez. Velocity was such a roller coaster ride. Great read, though a little messed up at times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dieliftin Posted August 29, 2014 Share Posted August 29, 2014 The Iliad was tough for me when I read it. I found it tedious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now