-Scott-emm- Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 i mean is it worth me buying it because reading all you comments makes me wonder if i should get it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MATTUMUZ Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 i mean is it worth me buying it because reading all you comments makes me wonder if i should get it Hum, to me personally, I think it was worth the money! However, from what I've read here, it's an aqquired taste! I suggest renting it first or watching as many videos as you can online, to decide for yourself! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the Ghost888 Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 i mean is it worth me buying it because reading all you comments makes me wonder if i should get it Give it a rent the only you can tell. Thats how it is for every game thats ever made. Everyone has different tastes. This thread proves it kinda. Some hate it some love it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xGodDogx Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 Well i was all up for this game but now im kinda just wondering what should i do. But because i have so much money ill proabbly end up buying this game ive bought worse PS.. Fuzion Frenzy lol Well i tell you east i think when i get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skillet Posted November 27, 2007 Share Posted November 27, 2007 I wont buy another Eidos product again. B-b-but... what about the future Hitman?!? Seriousely, complaining about a company over one game is stupid. It's like saying you'd never buy StarCraft II because Diablo 2 sucked. (it doesn't but it's a hypothetacle question so don't send me hateful PMs). Two completely different games, two completely different experiences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruthless Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 The preview and interview we did on the site specifically said that!! Didnt get time to read it. Come on guys, the game isn't that bad. It's quite fun actually. It's not game of the year or anything, but there is definately a lot of fun to be had. We'll see if the game gets extra content or what not. True its alot better in co-op, i dint like it at first but im kinda liking it now, however the guns are shit for long range shots and the aiming is poor, storyline is good and the game has a great concept, i would have used this idea well to make my game, just add alot of online feautures and better aiming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babyfarmer Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 I was expecting this to be the BEST game on the 360, no one told me there was no online co-op. Fragile alliance is boring after 2 games and i agree aiming is shit, however its still better than that mass effect shite, i wish i brought F.E.A.R Files but im selling the massivly dissapointing CoD 4 on ebay once ive done it on veteran. Online on CoD 4 is worst ive played, the rank up system is terrible. You actually expected this to be the best me for the 360? LOL, that's why you're disappointed. Mass Effect shit? Wow, that's just ignorant. You call CoD4 disappointing, and you're gonna get F.E.A.R. Files? LOL, have fun with that turd. CoD4's multiplayer is much more fun, and the rank up system in that game is genius, it keeps you coming back for more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ruthless Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 You actually expected this to be the best me for the 360? LOL, that's why you're disappointed. Mass Effect shit? Wow, that's just ignorant. You call CoD4 disappointing, and you're gonna get F.E.A.R. Files? LOL, have fun with that turd. CoD4's multiplayer is much more fun, and the rank up system in that game is genius, it keeps you coming back for more. Yeah but im an achievement whore so no online achievements is a waste of time, anyway i actually prefered CoD 2 online, Dude everyone is entilted to there own opinion and there is mine, however enough people have dissagreed with me now, so lets get back on topic. The video's and whole idea of the game looked brilliant so yes i expected it to be the best game on the 360. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AltruismIsDead Posted November 30, 2007 Share Posted November 30, 2007 I was sort of expecting this game to be a let down because it seemed like such an awesome game. I was never a fan of the Hitman series and was fearing that it might have some of the same controls, but over all I was fairly impressed by Kane & Lynch. Although the 2 biggest problems in the game (for me) is that both the campaign AND multiplayer is too short and lackluster. There are other problems with the game such as the spotty hit detection, and the absolutely retarded A.I. (how many times can the computer run into the same wall during a session of Fragile Alliance!?) I still found the game fun overall. And hopefully they'll release some new maps for online since playing with a bunch of friends is great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warlikegorilla Posted December 1, 2007 Share Posted December 1, 2007 i don't udnerstand how u guys can say this game sux, the game puts u in awesome scenario's, i liked it.. alot, i must agree on that the beginning was better than the ending, the ending was more of a war-game, like the bank robbing etc. more... but overall the game was awesome, when i was playing through some of the levels i really wished someone was there to experience it with me, i wanted to tell friends about some parts in the game immediatly, thats how cool it was and taking cover behind something is easy to do, just get to an edge of an object and press crouch, usually it will go into cover-mode.. didnt find it that much of a pain in the ass, only thing that bothered me was that enemy shot through walls ;P and i also saw people complaining about the accuracy of some guns, at close range all guns work, at long range.. do u expect an mp5 to shoot someone at long range with 100% accuracy? the aiming of guns were perfect imo, just need to learn how to shoot (btw for long range use m4a1) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halo3freak Posted December 1, 2007 Share Posted December 1, 2007 ok comments going all over the pages so i am going 2 buy it hehe reason it has my last name in it ....but seriously it looks like an al right game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pwnage Mountain Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 I'm suprised how many people think ill of this game. My friend told me it's crap but I bought it. I've been playing for five or six hours and so far it's pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deneco4 Posted December 3, 2007 Author Share Posted December 3, 2007 Hello there, im the OP. After playing it even further in I can still stand by my initial post. The game sucks. It sucks so bad that some poor bastard got fired over giving it a bad review just because the company he reviewed for had a deal with Eidos over the ad campaign for this game. So they fired him for giving it a bad review. I read the review and it was right on spot. The game was rushed. They spent more money on the trailer than they did on the fuking development. Plus no online co op...are we in the 80s?! WTF!? And quoted from the DEV team in an article i read "we didnt include co op because we wanted to realease it in time for christmas". Now...take Grand Theft. They delayed release so they could get it fucking right. Because Rockstar produces good games and stands by their product. They dont blow their load for a quick cash in. They make sure they get it right god love them. So, I wasted money on this and i cant return it. Ill play it, reluctantly, but i know if they delayed release a bit longer they could have made it better. And im not gonna bitch without providing solution ideas. Heres a list of things they could have done to make it better: 1. Sound effects. They are whisper quiet they could have bought some stock shit and put it in place of what they have. 2. 1 animation for a melee kill and it wasnt dramatic or cool or anything. You cant even really see anything, you just kill the guy with your fist or something. Couldve been 3 diff animations that were cool like Assassins Creed. 3. Online Co op. Duh. 4. Aiming system...better. 5. Grenades dont blow up they just poof like air bombs. Also aiming system sucks. 6. Blandness. Spice up the maps or the fighting or something, anything. 7. More in depth bank robbery. Like...not just shooting people but planning and robbing the bank. Big deal you can grapple down the building...its like...so played in the game like its some amazing new thing and they dont even have backpacks or rope that they hold with em. 8. Story. Like...all of a sudden you rob a bank and then all of a sudden you go to a club and then like all of a sudden your in the jungle. I just...dunno man. The trailer was so cool compared. Whatever, screw this, gonna play it drunk maybe itll seem better. They shouldve included the pills that lynch is taking with the game. Wouldve been more vital than a guitar for guitar hero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SysanApse NL Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 Whatever, screw this, gonna play it drunk maybe itll seem better. They shouldve included the pills that lynch is taking with the game. Wouldve been more vital than a guitar for guitar hero. Lol. can't wait to play this game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don Manolo Posted December 4, 2007 Share Posted December 4, 2007 I have played this game for like 30-40 hours (can't really tell anymore ) and I must say when you first start out the aiming does suck, but when you get used to that its actually a lot of fun! especially the online! I admit the graphics are no game of the year or anything but they are good enough to let me enjoy the game itself... I just love being the bad guy :uzi:hehe! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KindCandy Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 same here, i dint liked the game at all i mean AT ALL i just played the first part and stopped playong it, quite dissapointed with this title Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
headdragon Posted December 5, 2007 Share Posted December 5, 2007 I like the game it's not bad but not good either. And I don't regret the money. And the Story is about Revenge, you can't expect more of it^^'. For Grenades: They don't explode much different in the real world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matthewmcg360 Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 kane and lynch is surely inferior to almost all other xbox 360 games, certainly get mass effect over this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunn89 Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 Personally, i think this game online is quality, one of the best games i've played online for a while. A lot more tactics involved than you're cod4 or halo, 8/10 for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSouter Posted December 9, 2007 Share Posted December 9, 2007 I have to disagree, I thought it was a good game. It felt unfinished but playing with a mate on story mode makes it quite a lot of fun, so there are a few annoyances it still shows to be a good shooter. I nearly completed the game but my 360 froze and I couldn't be bothered to play through the whole level again. Its not one of the best games I have played but I got it brand new for £23 so I am not complaining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlazeDragon132 Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 I thought the game was an average game with an interesting story. Still, I been meaning to review it after the whole Eidos making up fake stars for it. I just can't get into it because Assassin's Creed is alot of fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xTHSx Rascal Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 I recon its a good game fun exiting story and online is not shit and as for the person said Now...take Grand Theft. They delayed release so they could get it fucking right. Because Rockstar produces good games and stands by their product. They dont blow their load for a quick cash in. They make sure they get it right god love them. now. looks at rockstar table tennis is that good NO also Sanandras wasnt as good as other GTA's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SysanApse NL Posted December 11, 2007 Share Posted December 11, 2007 I Played it , its much fun. The aiming sucks sometimes but overall this is a good game ill give it a 8/10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIGERBOOBOO Posted December 25, 2007 Share Posted December 25, 2007 I wasted my money. The sound effects are junk, the explosions are bland, the game itself is bland, the aiming system sucks, just another cover and fire stock game with a stupid story, unimpressive levels, and boring boring boring. I wish i had bought mass effect instead. Maybe they could have saved this game with online co op but they wanted to make the Xmas date so they canned it. I wont buy another Eidos product again. Good trailer does not equal a good game. The only good thing Eidos has ever published is the HITMAN franchise. but i am still willing to try this game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vista Posted December 26, 2007 Share Posted December 26, 2007 If i liked Hitman, Rainbow and the trailer is it worth buying? Is there any hope for eventual online co-op? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now