Sayam Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 Will there be any more? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metallicorphan Posted March 10, 2013 Share Posted March 10, 2013 There are only rumours at the moment,with Bethesda apparently trademarking the word/name 'Redguard' If Bethesda are sticking to the same plan,then Skyrim when looking at Oblivion and Morrowind,is coming up for a GOTY edition Morrowind-May 2002 release/GOTY October 2003 Oblivion-March 2006 release/GOTY September 2007 so roughly about a year and a half between the first release to GOTY,where as Skyrim is right now 1 year and 4 months since release Hopefully we will get that one last DLC before that happens Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sayam Posted March 10, 2013 Author Share Posted March 10, 2013 I heard the redguard rumor, but like the last set's the time between the rumor being leaked and them stepping and giving details is very short so not 100% sure on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proper Ryan Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAE48m5crYg&feature=youtu.be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ron north Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAE48m5crYg&feature=youtu.be You can see that it's fake because Dragonborn is not on the list. Also, the release date for Heartfire was September 4, 2012 and June 26, 2012 for Dawnguard. But assuming Steam got them one month late and if this is true, we can expect Redguard in the first week of May. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grohlvana Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 Can anyone confirm if this is fake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slaughter. Posted March 12, 2013 Share Posted March 12, 2013 There is definitely more DLC, it's just a rumor what this DLC is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neme6ben Posted March 13, 2013 Share Posted March 13, 2013 I'm pretty sure Bethesda said there would be at least one more dlc about a month ago! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarkReign2021 Posted March 16, 2013 Share Posted March 16, 2013 I don't think any game has 2000 GS. I'm not even sure if this is permitted by MS. They only seem to raise the GS limit on games when they need to make an exception for Halo, hence why the limit was taken from 1500 to 1750 when Halo 3's DLC came out. No game has gone higher than this mark. That said, I've got bad OCD and I don't think 1550 is honestly a bad place to stop. I would much rather have 1750, but at least it doesn't stop on some odd number. Screw games that have strange-numbered GS points! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodGodAlucard Posted March 16, 2013 Share Posted March 16, 2013 I don't think any game has 2000 GS. I'm not even sure if this is permitted by MS. They only seem to raise the GS limit on games when they need to make an exception for Halo, hence why the limit was taken from 1500 to 1750 when Halo 3's DLC came out. No game has gone higher than this mark. That said, I've got bad OCD and I don't think 1550 is honestly a bad place to stop. I would much rather have 1750, but at least it doesn't stop on some odd number. Screw games that have strange-numbered GS points! Gears of War 3 does. It was the first 360 game to reach it. In fact it's the only 360 to reach that limit so far. There is a PC game that has 2000 gamerscore. But that's not an Xbox game. 2000 is the official new limit. So it's completely possible for Skyrim to reach it, and I really hope it does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veedrock Posted March 16, 2013 Share Posted March 16, 2013 (edited) Gears of War 3 does. It was the first 360 game to reach it. In fact it's the only 360 to reach that limit so far. There is a PC game that has 2000 gamerscore. But that's not an Xbox game. 2000 is the official new limit. So it's completely possible for Skyrim to reach it, and I really hope it does. Gears 3 is not the first, only, or even the highest. Monster Hunter Frontier has been over 2000G for a long time (at 2750G now), and Pinball FX2 recently hit 2050G. Edited March 16, 2013 by Veedrock Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitnoid Posted March 16, 2013 Share Posted March 16, 2013 Gears of War 3 does. It was the first 360 game to reach it. In fact it's the only 360 to reach that limit so far. There is a PC game that has 2000 gamerscore. But that's not an Xbox game. 2000 is the official new limit. So it's completely possible for Skyrim to reach it, and I really hope it does. What the heck for? DLC should not have achievements, all games should stay at 1000 or 200. Sheesh. Wouldn't you rather have a new game than dlc? I mean, you could get 1000 more instead of 250 or so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skillet Posted March 16, 2013 Share Posted March 16, 2013 What the heck for? DLC should not have achievements, all games should stay at 1000 or 200. Sheesh. Wouldn't you rather have a new game than dlc? I mean, you could get 1000 more instead of 250 or so... The fact that you care so much is WHY DLC has achievements. Any developer with an ounce of business sense knows that it is a smart decision to add achievements to DLC... it increases sales. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitnoid Posted March 16, 2013 Share Posted March 16, 2013 The fact that you care so much is WHY DLC has achievements. Any developer with an ounce of business sense knows that it is a smart decision to add achievements to DLC... it increases sales. YES! I understand from a "business sense" why they exist. What I cannot fathom is why the consumer really CARES about points that are worthless! And even if one were predisposted to care, why not yammer on about a NEW game with the possibility of 1000 gamerscore instead of a piddly 250 for a dlc? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Scotty Posted March 16, 2013 Share Posted March 16, 2013 YES! I understand from a "business sense" why they exist. What I cannot fathom is why the consumer really CARES about points that are worthless! And even if one were predisposted to care, why not yammer on about a NEW game with the possibility of 1000 gamerscore instead of a piddly 250 for a dlc? well, because every point counts and the DLC is almost deffinitely coming out, so people are gonna 'yammer' on about the possible achievements that come with it. also, people care so much about 'worthless' points, because they do. its that simple. why would you care about anything, hobby related, its essentially all worthless, but its interesting and entertaining to someone, so it isn't worthless at all. just how i see it anyway. my gamerscore is nothing to brag about (around 87k), but im obsessed with trying to get achievements, its a big decider for buying new games for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitnoid Posted March 16, 2013 Share Posted March 16, 2013 well, because every point counts and the DLC is almost deffinitely coming out, so people are gonna 'yammer' on about the possible achievements that come with it. also, people care so much about 'worthless' points, because they do. its that simple. why would you care about anything, hobby related, its essentially all worthless, but its interesting and entertaining to someone, so it isn't worthless at all. just how i see it anyway. my gamerscore is nothing to brag about (around 87k), but im obsessed with trying to get achievements, its a big decider for buying new games for me. And I will agree that I try to get all of the achievements for a game, but I like my gamerscore to be pure. 1000 per game and I can see if someone completed a game. When you start adding for dlc, its hard to figure out if someone completed unless you happen to know how many points total for a given game + dlc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Scotty Posted March 16, 2013 Share Posted March 16, 2013 And I will agree that I try to get all of the achievements for a game, but I like my gamerscore to be pure. 1000 per game and I can see if someone completed a game. When you start adding for dlc, its hard to figure out if someone completed unless you happen to know how many points total for a given game + dlc. i suppose to an extent, i see what you are saying and having scores like 1370:gsicon: like DA2 has, it looks strange, but personally i will take any achievement score total. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodGodAlucard Posted March 16, 2013 Share Posted March 16, 2013 (edited) Gears 3 is not the first, only, or even the highest. Monster Hunter Frontier has been over 2000G for a long time (at 2750G now), and Pinball FX2 recently hit 2050G. Monster Hunter Frontier is a Japanese only title. So I don't even consider that since not a single person on this site has played it according to the Leaderboards. Pinball FX2 is a rare exception. But I'm not sure if it hit 2K before Gears or not. What the heck for? DLC should not have achievements, all games should stay at 1000 or 200. Sheesh. Wouldn't you rather have a new game than dlc? I mean, you could get 1000 more instead of 250 or so... Because I like the game and want to experience new content in it. DLC without achievements doesn't sell well in most cases because achievement hunters feel cheated by it. That's not how I feel 100% of time. But I think most people on this site would. YES! I understand from a "business sense" why they exist. What I cannot fathom is why the consumer really CARES about points that are worthless! And even if one were predisposted to care, why not yammer on about a NEW game with the possibility of 1000 gamerscore instead of a piddly 250 for a dlc? It's not about the points. (For me atleast.) I just want to enjoy the game more and spend more time on it. So new content is always welcome to games I like. Edited March 16, 2013 by BloodGodAlucard Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitnoid Posted March 16, 2013 Share Posted March 16, 2013 It's not about the points. (For me atleast.) I just want to enjoy the game more and spend more time on it. So new content is always welcome to games I like. I dunno, after 1000 points, I'm pretty much tired of a game. Especially with all of the grinding achievements. Wouldn't you rather have Elder Scrolls VI? And besides, as long as Skyrim is going strong with dlc, we'll not see a new Fallout either. There are still dungeons I've never touched in Skyrim and never plan to. I guess I've burned out on snow... Also, the achievements only work with marketing as long as people drool over more achievement points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BloodGodAlucard Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 I dunno, after 1000 points, I'm pretty much tired of a game. Especially with all of the grinding achievements. Wouldn't you rather have Elder Scrolls VI? And besides, as long as Skyrim is going strong with dlc, we'll not see a new Fallout either. There are still dungeons I've never touched in Skyrim and never plan to. I guess I've burned out on snow... Also, the achievements only work with marketing as long as people drool over more achievement points. Of course I'd rather have Elder Scrolls 6. But that's years away. And it wouldn't use the same people anyway. There's different people working on DLC and sequels to games simultaneously in development studios. And you're mistaken about Skyrim DLC interfering with a new Fallout game's development. There would be a different team assigned to that project if it exists currently. As far as people drooling over achievements, I'd say that's a gaming trend that's likely to continue into the future. I mean take the site we're on right now, it's completely devoted to the pursuit of gamerscore. Some people take it way too far by playing games solely for that purpose to the point where they play games they truly hate just to get another 1000. I'd never do that at this point. I try to only play games I'm genuinely interested in. Although I have played some that I didn't like that I suffered through for completions sake. I don't do that anymore though. Lately I've honestly lost my lust for achievement hunting. I attribute that to the fact that I've recently gotten into PC gaming. I can play those games without having to worry about my gamerscore. And it's a real relief honestly. You don't have to stress and can focus on just having fun. That's the way gaming should be in my opinion. I still loving hearing that magical bleep-bloop sound though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbear. Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 I dunno, after 1000 points, I'm pretty much tired of a game. Especially with all of the grinding achievements. Wouldn't you rather have Elder Scrolls VI? And besides, as long as Skyrim is going strong with dlc, we'll not see a new Fallout either. There are still dungeons I've never touched in Skyrim and never plan to. I guess I've burned out on snow... Also, the achievements only work with marketing as long as people drool over more achievement points. Bethesda outsourced the development of Fallout:New Vegas to Obsidian so there is no reason why they wouldn't potentially do the same thing. So saying that them working on Skyrim DLC is holding back Fallout production is a flawed argument. Also, a lot of programmers work on DLC as side projects while working on major projects. Hearthfire was never an intended DLC, it was a side project that some guys worked on in their spare time and Bethesda decided to release it. I really don't understand why you are complaining about DLC and the extra gamerscore they provide. With some companies, sure its a money grab. However, Bethesda despite their many other problems, always release seriously large DLC for their games that add dozens of hours of gameplay to the original content. The extra GS is just an added bonus to that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIMPLYMIDGET Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 YES! I understand from a "business sense" why they exist. What I cannot fathom is why the consumer really CARES about points that are worthless! And even if one were predisposted to care, why not yammer on about a NEW game with the possibility of 1000 gamerscore instead of a piddly 250 for a dlc? Guess you're not old enough to appreciate "high score" on an arcade game. Same concept. Bragging rights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metallicorphan Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 I like getting achievements,but not so fussed about the score they hold Saying that though,i have made it a personal mission to try and break 100k by the time the new Xbox is out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SIMPLYMIDGET Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 I like getting achievements,but not so fussed about the score they hold Saying that though,i have made it a personal mission to try and break 100k by the time the new Xbox is out I was trying to obtain 200k... but Skyrim keeps holding me back (in a good way). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitnoid Posted March 17, 2013 Share Posted March 17, 2013 Bethesda outsourced the development of Fallout:New Vegas to Obsidian so there is no reason why they wouldn't potentially do the same thing. So saying that them working on Skyrim DLC is holding back Fallout production is a flawed argument. Also, a lot of programmers work on DLC as side projects while working on major projects. Hearthfire was never an intended DLC, it was a side project that some guys worked on in their spare time and Bethesda decided to release it. I really don't understand why you are complaining about DLC and the extra gamerscore they provide. With some companies, sure its a money grab. However, Bethesda despite their many other problems, always release seriously large DLC for their games that add dozens of hours of gameplay to the original content. The extra GS is just an added bonus to that. I never said they wouldn't WORK on the next project, I said they won't RELEASE the next project until they can milk as much as they can out of the current release, no matter what title. I'm saying, instead of wanting, wishing, desiring more dlc because it adds to gamerscore, it would be more beneficial to get a NEW game with something fresh, for 1000 more gs instead of 250 or so for a dlc. They do it because people BUY it. Hence, day 1 or day 10 dlc releases. I do, however, like the ps3 idea where gamerscore isn't a priority but getting platinum does. That actually MEANS something. And to the one who said I wasn't old enough to remember high scores, if everyone has the same high score, who really cares? Besides, my dad bought us Pong when it came out, and there were no achievements. But it was a blast to play! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now