Username
Password
    
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier
Ghost Recon: Future Soldier 'Next' Spied
Written By
View author's profile

Ghost Recon: Future Soldier could be getting a sequel if a slide spied at Ubisoft Kiev's annual meeting, with reference made to the "GRFS: Next" team is to be believed. The image was posted on the Ubisoft forums after being spotted by keen-eyed fans.

Responsible for the PC port of Ghost Recon: Future Soldier, the slide states that the core development team behind the console release, Ubisoft Paris wants to work with Ubi Kiev for the proposed sequel.

Hopefully development on a sequel - if indeed there is one - will be smoother sailing than Ghost Recon: Future Soldier's dev cycle, which saw the game subjected to numerous delays. We ended up scoring the game 70 out of 100 in our review.

[Via VG247]




 
 

User Comments

Forum Posts: 0
Comment #2 by trousersocialgathering
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 07:47:23 AM
(4Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Disappointing game.


Forum Posts: 152
Comment #3 by MightyPeter
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 08:03:20 AM
(3Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Just gimme the new Rainbow 6, I really, REALLY NEED IT!!!

Pretty please with sugar on top?


Forum Posts: 7115
Comment #4 by Opiate42
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 08:04:04 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Future Soldier was okay, liked the tactical mechanics of the sync shots and target designations but it was on the whole a pretty boring game.


Forum Posts: 108
Comment #5 by Slayinfool
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 08:32:28 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Good, loved the game!


Forum Posts: 129
Comment #6 by Earth Djinn
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 09:09:55 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
It was a good game, but I'd be lying if I said I wouldn't have preferred GRAW3.


Forum Posts: 325
Comment #7 by chrishaney23
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 09:28:32 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
I love GR. Owned EVERY game and add-on ever released, but this last game was just missing something. Never could put my finger on it. And the MP, IMO, was god awful in GR:FS. I dont think I will buy another one without playing it first. FS was just to big of a drastic change from what they have always been. It was Splinter Cell Conviction..PERIOD!


Forum Posts: 180
Comment #8 by Lothra
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 09:40:36 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
No thanks, New Rainbow Six or GRAW3 instead.


Forum Posts: 1414
Comment #9 by Vindicator51
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 09:44:34 AM
(-1Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
I'm surprised they're making another game. It didn't even seem to be that great.


Forum Posts: 7
Comment #10 by Talyn328
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 10:14:31 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Guess I'm in the minority, I really enjoyed the SP and MP both in GRFS especially once they patched it up. Wish they would have put Guerilla mode in the matchmaking system though. So I'm looking forward to a sequel.


Forum Posts: 26
Comment #11 by Wing X Custom
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 10:26:42 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Please no. Corner camping galore.


Forum Posts: 755
Comment #12 by Hurricane Of 87
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 11:22:36 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
GRFS is what happens when you outsource development of your game to Malaysian sweatshops.


Forum Posts: 499
Comment #13 by AirborneRichard
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 12:29:28 PM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
I agree with you 10, even i got to admit it wasn,t perfect tho. I liked the single player and the MP, we had some great matches and the very start and everyone just had a great time, untill... yes untill the famous COD guys discovered the game and ruined it with camping and the overuse of the fire ammo on most guns. Guerilla mode was kinda boring those compared the the awesome co-op they had in GRAW 1 and 2. Wish they did something simular again in the next one and drop geurilla mode, because its fun at start but gets boring real fast.


Forum Posts: 292
Comment #14 by ViNyLek
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 12:48:58 PM
(1Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
I used to love Ghost Recon franchise, but I have not even touched FS yet. I played MP beta and it was atrocious. I can't believe they would slap GR tag to it. Of course I might be overreacting as I have yet to play actual game (in no hurry for that as well), but I truly hope that they will get GR back to its glory before FS....


Forum Posts: 221
Comment #15 by the ferenczy
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 06:05:17 PM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Hopefully better the 'next' time around.


Forum Posts: 83
Comment #16 by Wilkz07
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 06:10:40 PM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Fix mp or take it out, make coop better, fix campaign to make it more like the other graw instead of generic third person.


Forum Posts: 134
Comment #17 by Duds911
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 06:25:46 PM
(1Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
"Really great game under tough working conditions" lol, wasn't that great of a game and the "tough working conditions" were self-imposed.


Forum Posts: 1068
Comment #18 by The Bum-Mobile
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 09:50:30 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Although I never beat it (I"m easily side-tracked! I'll do it eventually...) the co-op campaign was really great. Multiplayer, not so much. That's where they need to pool their resources.


Forum Posts: 183
Comment #19 by Yomnad84
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 10:51:19 AM
(1Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
UBISOFT HERES THE BEST IDEA SOMEONE CAN EVER GIVE YOU !!!!!!!!!!!!!

JUST REMAKE THE VERY FIRST GHOST RECON IT WAS THE BEST GAME EVER MADE THANKS !


Forum Posts: 201
Comment #20 by Kivlov
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 11:55:26 AM
(-1Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Mp was good in Future Soldier, but never bought it because of how awful the singleplayer looked. I know it is meant to have really high tech equipment but I just couldnt get over how awful the shooting seemed and those awful floating rings around your guns.

Make it less clunky and more like R6: Vegas and I will be happy.


Forum Posts: 19
Comment #21 by SeraphTC
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 06:42:35 PM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
I hope if/when they develop the next GR they *stop* looking at CoD/Generic FPS and look back at GRAW and the other GR titles.

GR:FS was completely dumbed down and it really didn't need to be. It didn't do them any favours - reviews were pretty unspectacular and sales weren't fantastic either.

Get back to the series roots please Ubi!


Forum Posts: 190
Comment #22 by Luis Ownz
Sunday, December 23, 2012 @ 03:31:48 AM
(-1Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Haven't tried FS yet, would be interested though, looks fun. But I KNOW I'd rather have GRAW3.


Forum Posts: 0
Comment #23 by VictorGRFS
Sunday, December 23, 2012 @ 02:28:41 PM
(-1Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
I absolutely loved the game, I loved the cover system, the cinematic way the game plays out (e.g camera changing position when you sprint in campaign) the animations, absolutely perfect (mocap'd by SEALs, hope that returns for next game) and the melee animations krav maga etc
I really liked the campaign and the way it played out so hopefully in the next game it is just as good if not better. I wonder if it will still be modern (today setting) or they return to the futuristic setting as originally planned, as with the success of BO2.


Forum Posts: 80
Comment #24 by chizrocker88
Tuesday, January 01, 2013 @ 09:09:19 PM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
I loved GR:FS. Sure it lacked a little bit from its predecessors but I still thought it was one of the best shooters of the year.


You need to register before being able to post comments.

 


 
Game Info
Developer:
Ubisoft Paris
Publisher:
Ubisoft
Genre:

Release:

US May 22, 2012
Europe May 25, 2012

Collection:781
Wishlist:264
 
 
Screenshots
 
 
Videos
 
 
MyAchievements
You need to log in or register to use MyAchievements.
 
 
Related News
 
 
Rating
   

70   


84


0

You need to log in or register to rate games.

User Score is based on 266 user ratings.