Username
Password
    
Medal of Honor: Warfighter
"We Should Have Done Better" With Medal of Honor: Warfighter, Says EA Exec
Written By
View author's profile

A top-ranking EA executive has admitted that Medal of Honor: Warfighter should have been better, saying that the title lacked quality leadership.

Warfighter hit in October last year, to generally poor reviews and a lackluster commercial reception. Our review called it “average in almost every department” and gave it 55.

Rich Hilleman, EA’s Chief Creative Director, said that the issue with Warfighter was not related to the over-saturated FPS genre, or its similarities to Call of Duty. Instead it was to do with execution.

"We don't think its a genre problem," said Hilleman. "It was an execution problem. We don't think Medal of Honor's performance speaks to any particular bias in that space against modern settings, World War II, or any of that. It's much more that we had some things we should've done better."

Hilleman elaborated by suggesting that Warfighter developer Danger Close needs to strengthen its team.

"I think a key part of this is having the right amount of high-quality production talent," he said. "And we didn't have the quality of leadership we needed to make [Medal of Honor] great. We just have to get the leadership aligned."

Late last month EA revealed that it has shelved the Medal of Honor series until further notice.

[via Rock, Paper, Shotgun]




 
 

User Comments

Forum Posts: 19
Comment #1 by Chainsaw Chunk
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 06:35:36 AM
(-3Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Yes they should have done better and not released it at all it is an abomination FACT


Forum Posts: 19
Comment #2 by SeraphTC
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 06:46:47 AM
(7Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
@1 I think you need to learn the difference between your own opinion and fact.

Is it an amazing game? No ofc it isn't. It's not as bad as you are suggesting though - I've seen reviews for and played a LOT worse.

Time to let this bandwagon move along.


Forum Posts: 162
Comment #3 by IIIII Matt IIIII
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 06:51:56 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Still need to have a go of this,
rent or buy is the question?


Forum Posts: 2574
Comment #4 by jamie1000013
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 06:54:13 AM
(1Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
I really enjoyed the first Medal of honor although the campaign was short and the multiplayer could have been better. The second one however was really poor, the single player was still decent but didn't grip you as much as the first one did. The multiplayer however was just plain awful with the god awful layout and the crappy buddy system which could have worked well but didn't.

The first one showed such potential I don't know where they messed up same with Kane and Lynch 2.


Forum Posts: 878
Comment #5 by GeneralGranko
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 06:55:13 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
@3

Do not buy. Do not rent. Unless you are ultimate completionist, then there is no reason to get this game. But if you really must - rent.


Forum Posts: 2123
Comment #6 by pined5551
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 06:59:45 AM
(1Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
You should just shut the fuck up and make a decent game. People will buy it if it's good. Put the product first in terms of priority and the profits will tkae care of themselves. You would know this, EA, if you weren't a bunch of fucking retards!


Forum Posts: 910
Comment #7 by TacticalTodger
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 07:00:47 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
@3 Depends if you can find it for £10 if so buy it, it's not as bad as everybody says it is Online wise it's pretty good, Single player wise no it's crap. Plus if you rent you'll need an online pass.


Forum Posts: 19
Comment #8 by Chainsaw Chunk
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 07:10:43 AM
(-3Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
@2 so you have read a review and believe you have played worse, well buy it and then express YOUR opinion I played it day 1 it required a patch to fix its broken ass and was horrible. Fact is everybody hated this game everybody EA have binned the franchise. Opinions are like A$$holes


Forum Posts: 28
Comment #9 by TotalBlank
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 07:10:57 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
The game is absolutely horrid. Now they are playing the blame game because they aren't cashing in like they usually do.


Forum Posts: 115
Comment #10 by Steakslave
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 07:11:12 AM
(1Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Funny how there was just an article of how demos can possibly hurt game sales. This game is a good example of that possibility. This first game's MP was passable, but this one was just awful from what the demo showed.

Maybe if developers & publishers know ahead of time that they have a turd on their hands they should at least give the game easy achievements to drive sales to a small degree. Hell, I've played my fair share of stinkers to see that nice 1000G in the end, but this game will never be one of them...


Forum Posts: 208
Comment #11 by DeadlySinz86
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 07:30:40 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Its sad to see 1 of the first WW1@2 FPS giants fall. But I think it's a franchise that deserves another shot, but it needs to be done correctly. I think they should stay away from the Modern FPS area, CoD and BF have that pretty well covered and any other franchise don't really stand much of a chance. What they need to do is stick at what they were good at, maybe go back to WW1&2 or even Vietnam. Hell ... why not an American Civil War FPS? That could be pretty sick and to my knowledge, it's never be done in an FPS>


Forum Posts: 37
Comment #12 by thenewpeter
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 07:31:27 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Maybe they shouldn't of tried to make another generic spunkgargledweewee game then. There's where they went wrong :/
Never mind giving it the title 'war fighter' ... it's just so lazy...


Forum Posts: 494
Comment #13 by Timmsy
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 07:48:24 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
first one got 65% and second one got 55% bit of a no brainer of a big franchise reboot like MOH


Forum Posts: 37
Comment #14 by thenewpeter
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 07:48:55 AM
(-1Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
@4... the first only had split screen multiplayer.. I'll take it you mean the other one on the 360...


Forum Posts: 399
Comment #15 by General Boredom
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 07:51:36 AM
(2Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
"Rich Hilleman, EA’s Chief Creative Director, said that the issue with Warfighter was not related to the over-saturated FPS genre, or its similarities to Call of Duty. Instead it was to do with execution."

No, that's EXACTLY what the problem was. MoH:Warfighter, was an unoriginal, uninispired, "me too" modern military FPS that didn't bring anything unique to the table.


Forum Posts: 46
Comment #16 by NHS KEMISH
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 08:06:18 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
I really dont think its that bad I 1000G the game and it is good, it remembered me to COD MW 1 with the flag mode. So I think it wasnt that bad


Forum Posts: 7108
Comment #17 by Opiate42
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 08:09:12 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Should have done better....

No shit.


Forum Posts: 1699
Comment #18 by The Duke of Darkness
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 08:10:36 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
@8 #2 has played it hence how they know they've played worse.


Forum Posts: 7
Comment #19 by Jester 343i
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 08:15:10 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Never played this online, but have to admit did enjoy playing through the campaign.


Forum Posts: 2200
Comment #20 by cheevo360
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 08:28:22 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Just bring back Medal of Honor as World War again please. This is what Medal of Honor about. Danger Close is one of worst publishers that EA should admit since both Medal of Honor series for modern war were awful.

Medal of Honor need sticks World War since original series. :)


Forum Posts: 125
Comment #21 by Pr0ph3cy
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 08:46:16 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
thank god I didn't buy the second one


Forum Posts: 118
Comment #22 by Nitewalkar
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 08:54:31 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
They brought this game back and made a sequel as a way to get people to pay for access to battlefield betas


Forum Posts: 486
Comment #23 by plum
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 09:08:13 AM
(2Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
The campaign was one of the best I have played in a long time. Also online is great very fun with 4 friend squads. Really don't get why there's so much hate it's a far better game than the previous game try it before you make a comment.


Forum Posts: 5
Comment #24 by mr1861
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 09:22:13 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Strike Three! You are out!


Forum Posts: 170
Comment #25 by eragon3443
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 10:07:20 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
I enjoyed both Medal of Honors, and have put more hours into both more than I have of any other shooter, except CoD4. Warfighter was amazing, and I don't know why so many people hated it!


Forum Posts: 0
Comment #26 by fdmbayman
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 10:15:43 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
@11 Not bad suggestions however there was a civil war game made but it was lackluster. So it still could have potential.


Forum Posts: 11
Comment #27 by Finn Jake n BMO
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 10:21:44 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
@3 buy it. its ok game but you need an online pass which is $10 (if you plan on getting all achievements?) you should be able to find it new for $20 and that will give you all time you need to finish it.


Forum Posts: 89
Comment #28 by strawberry
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 10:22:48 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
they should stop making generic games.


Forum Posts: 147
Comment #29 by hotdogenigma
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 10:28:42 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
It's hilarious this game tanked in similar fashion to it's immediate predecessor, you'd think they would have learned. Anyways, my opinion is oversaturation in the FPS genre and EA wanting a bigger piece of the pie.


Forum Posts: 141
Comment #30 by Rastaman20
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 10:32:19 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
at least EA has come forward and said hey we dropped the ball, but honestly with a franchise like MoH, why the fuck wouldent you have the best you could get if your wanting to make money off it?

that just shows they just want to sit back and not want to put any money on making a quality game and yet still want you to go out and pay full price for a crappy game


Forum Posts: 410
Comment #31 by Optomistic
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 11:00:09 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
I'm disappointed that this wasn't it good as it could of been, I really wanted MoH to make a comeback. Like #2, Hating on EA has become sooo lame. Everyone does it cos it's cool, but thats cos they are one of the biggest guys around.


Forum Posts: 210
Comment #32 by Sanchezz4387
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 11:38:25 AM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
hindsight ey


Forum Posts: 306
Comment #33 by CASCADEYOUTH
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 03:27:59 PM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
I thought multiplayer was pretty decent despite the clunky weapon customization menu and spawn menu


Forum Posts: 191
Comment #34 by ash356
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 06:35:34 PM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Meh, give me a HD re-release of MOH:Frontline and 'maybe' I'll forgive you :)


Forum Posts: 106
Comment #35 by DEFCON 1
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 09:03:39 PM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
they should of not made it instead.


Forum Posts: 14
Comment #36 by Raging Bullgod
Wednesday, February 13, 2013 @ 09:43:07 PM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
What Medal of Honor should have been was an SP focused game. Like the others before it. Leave the MP to Battlefield. You can not compete with BF or COD. THQ tried with Homefront.

But now every game has to be a AAA hit or it gets shelved. There is no room for mid range games.


Forum Posts: 555
Comment #37 by fresh fish 101
Thursday, February 14, 2013 @ 02:02:09 PM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
and they wonder why i dont buy these crappy titles thaty make... cuz these are the types of stories that come out 6 months later about them.


Forum Posts: 4
Comment #38 by CxHxUxD
Thursday, March 07, 2013 @ 02:37:03 PM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
"...was not related to the over-saturated FPS genre, or its similarities to Call of Duty..." too many FPS games out there too hard to create the perfect game these days! The only good reviews it got were from its vets who were actually over in the middle east serving our country. I'm glad I snagged this game for 25$ on black Friday. Get me my 1000Gs in there regardless!


Forum Posts: 8
Comment #39 by Lieutenant Horatio Caine
Sunday, December 22, 2013 @ 05:14:17 PM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Wait, whats wrong with the name. I actually loved it. lol :D


Forum Posts: 8
Comment #40 by Lieutenant Horatio Caine
Sunday, December 22, 2013 @ 05:15:40 PM
(0) Thumbs Up Thumbs Down Report Comment
Game*** ;)


You need to register before being able to post comments.

 


 
Game Info
Developer:
Danger Close
Publisher:
Electronic Arts
Genre:

Release:

US October 23, 2012
Europe October 26, 2012

Collection:441
Wishlist:97
 
 
Screenshots
 
 
Videos
 
 
MyAchievements
You need to log in or register to use MyAchievements.
 
 
Related News
 
 
Rating
   

55   


74


0

You need to log in or register to rate games.

User Score is based on 139 user ratings.