Comments
Friday, April 29, 2016 @ 03:36 PM
I hope for Bad Company 3 or a 2142 spinoff.Friday, April 29, 2016 @ 03:39 PM
SO excitedFriday, April 29, 2016 @ 03:46 PM
Please be WWI. Failing that, another Vietnam or even Korea. Some theater that has not been completely played out over the last 15 years. No more modern/future shit. Leave that to Call of Duty.Friday, April 29, 2016 @ 03:54 PM
Where can we watch it live?Friday, April 29, 2016 @ 03:57 PM
Bad Company 3 or fuck off.Friday, April 29, 2016 @ 03:59 PM
If it's BFBC3 I'll be SO happy.Friday, April 29, 2016 @ 04:06 PM
They aren't saying Battlefield 5, so either they're trying to be secretive and it is Battlefield 5. Or it's Battlefield: something.Friday, April 29, 2016 @ 04:59 PM
Anything old style I like, Vietnam on bc2 was awesome. Imagine that but a full game!!!!Friday, April 29, 2016 @ 05:19 PM
Wonder how much content will be cut for the season pass? Love Battlefield games, but fed up with the Premium content. Might as well wait for the inevitable GotY/premium edition, been burnt by Battlefield too many times.Friday, April 29, 2016 @ 05:36 PM
To everyone touting a Vietnam game, do you really want a game where the outcome is YOU LOSE THE BATTLE? Or, would you like to play as the North Koreans and kill American and South Koreans? There's a reason why WWI, WWII, and futuristic warfare games were so much fun to play. THEY WERE WARS AND BATTLES THAT AMERICA AND ITS ALLIES WON!!!Friday, April 29, 2016 @ 05:50 PM
@11: 1. Not all gamers are American, so "You lose the battle" is ethnocentric and inapplicable. 2. America and it's allies didn't lose Vietnam. There was no winner either. 3. The Vietnam DLC to BFBC2 was awesome and a ton of fun. And as noted above, it would be different from what everyone else is doing.Friday, April 29, 2016 @ 05:55 PM
@10 couldn't give a shit about historical accuracy lol.Friday, April 29, 2016 @ 06:04 PM
@10 Bad Company 2 Vietnam expansion may have been among the best ever expansions I ever experienced. I'd love a full version. Also in literally every online war game, you play as both the Allies and the enemy, the historical result of the war means nothing.Friday, April 29, 2016 @ 06:11 PM
BC3 or GTFO.Friday, April 29, 2016 @ 06:13 PM
I hope they learnt from their mistakes and missteps in BF4 and Battlefront. Im anxious to see whats next. Just, PLEASE, no futuristic bullshit like COD.Friday, April 29, 2016 @ 06:37 PM
I heard there will be dinosaurs.Saturday, April 30, 2016 @ 12:06 AM
Vietnam! BF Vietnam on PC is one of my top 10 games of all time. I'd love a console version. Bc2's expansion was good, but I craved so much more from it!Saturday, April 30, 2016 @ 12:48 AM
im so excited i hope its a futureistick battlefield game not some old looking battlefield gameSaturday, April 30, 2016 @ 01:40 AM
Hey 10 go fuck your self. Also how many WWI games have you played? What one tops ? Yeah that's what I thought. Take your high horse and get the fuck outta Dodge.Saturday, April 30, 2016 @ 01:58 AM
-insert bandwagon 'I hope its a WW1/WW2/Vietnam game!" comment- Seriously though, Bad Company 3, please.Saturday, April 30, 2016 @ 04:28 AM
I'd actually like an HD remake of BF2 Modern Combat. Some really excellent maps there.Saturday, April 30, 2016 @ 06:55 AM
Yeah Bad Company 2 is easily the best Battlefield imo. Building on top of that one for a third is the way to go.Saturday, April 30, 2016 @ 07:40 AM
Im with @1 on this, BC3 or 2143. Most shooters nowadays focus alot on customisation and versatile gameplay. So im wondering how people expect a ww1 game, for example, because, for me, it would be pretty dull and lack what the modern/future shooters have in terms of versatile gameplay. And what are you gunna customise in a ww1 shooter? A bell for your pushbike?! Lol. But each to their own, i guessSunday, May 01, 2016 @ 03:09 AM
@23 One customization could be a bayonet with Tommy or French blood for the GermansSunday, May 01, 2016 @ 03:45 AM
@1-23: ITS Battlield 1944. YOU'RE WELCOME! Image Was leaked yesterday on Reddit!Sunday, May 01, 2016 @ 06:39 AM
@25 Fairplay, but 99% of the internet is lies and people posting shit, lol. But if it is true, then ill be passing on battlefield this time.Sunday, May 01, 2016 @ 04:08 PM
"EA confirms a new Battlefield game will have Jetpacks, Zombies and REVOLUTIONARY fish AI"Sunday, May 01, 2016 @ 04:25 PM
@11 Didn't lose Vietnam? On what planet does the complete collapse of South Vietnam which they were trying to prop up, wholesale withdrawal of western forces and unification of Vietnam as a socialist republic under Ho Chi Minh not qualify as America losing the war?Sunday, May 01, 2016 @ 06:56 PM
@28. In the same way the PRC took 40km, lost 50 thousand dead, and claimed victory in 1980. Gotta love retelling of tales. France lost, America lost, China lost.Tuesday, May 03, 2016 @ 01:15 AM
@29 If we measured military victory simply on manpower losses then the Germans won the second world war.Tuesday, May 03, 2016 @ 09:29 AM
@10 America didnt win shit, Great Britain did. About America and its allies? It was OUR war, you merely joined. Winston Churchill or get the fuck out.Wednesday, May 04, 2016 @ 12:20 AM
@31. The Soviet Union would like to have a word
Friday, April 29, 2016
EA is gearing up to reveal the next Battlefield game next week, with a brief and to-the-point teaser on Twitter that simply reads "see the future of Battlefield", tagging the game's World Premiere for 6th May at 4pm ET/9pm BST.
Set to take place with a live streamed debut, it's anyone's guess at this moment in time what form the next Battlefield game will take. One rumour has suggested that it could be a World War I shooter, but we're really not so sure about that. It sounds highly dubious.
The next Battlefield - presumably Battlefield 5 - will debut on the official site here. We'll be ready and waiting for the big reveal to drop. Stay tuned.